Makara - Myth or fact? - Swami B.G. Narasingha MaharajaMakara - Myth or fact?
Sri RadhastamiŚrī Rādhāṣṭamī
By Published On: August 19, 2011Tags: 22 min read

"Śrī Kṛṣṇa Janmāṣṭamī' is based upon a lecture given by Śrīla B.G. Narasingha Maharaja on Śrī Kṛṣṇa Janmāṣṭamī on the 4th September 2007 in South India.

Janmāstamī, the appearance day of Lord Kṛṣṇa, is the eighth lunar day after the full moon. When Kṛṣṇa manifests in this world, the moon takes on a dark colour during that phase. In regards to His appearance and activities, Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā:

yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati bhārata
abhyutthānam adharmasya tadātmānaṁ sṛjāmy aham

“O descendant of Bharata, whenever there is a decline in religious principles and a rise of irreligion, at that time I personally appear.” (Gītā 4.7)

Kṛṣṇa says that whenever there is a rise of irreligion or a decline of religion, He appears in this world. Throughout the Vedas, the Highest Entity of truth is known as Bhagavān. In Bhagavad-gītā we find the words, śrī bhagavān uvāca. This means that the Highest Entity is speaking the Bhagavad-gītā. Also, in the Śrīmad Bhāgavatam we find the words, kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam (‘Kṛṣṇa Himself is the Supreme’). Kṛṣṇa is the avatārī – the source of all avatāras. In this world, there are different ages – Satya-yuga, Treta-yuga, Dvāpara-yuga and Kali-yuga – and during these yugas there are scheduled descents of Bhagavān. Whenever Bhagavān comes into this world, He has a purpose that will benefit all species of life.

Unfortunately, we live at a time when anyone with a little money can print a poster exclaiming, “I am Bhagavān!” But such ‘Bhagavāns’ cannot give any real benefit to the people. Of course, many of these ‘Bhagavāns’ perform some social work by opening hospitals etc. Opening hospitals is good, but the government has been opening hospitals for a long time. Mother Theresa opened many hospitals and Fidel Castro of Cuba has also opened many hospitals around the world – yet we would not call Mother Theresa or Castro Bhagavān! Opening hospitals is a very good thing, but it is also a very ordinary thing. Opening a hospital is nothing new or extraordinary. However, whenever Bhagavān appears, He does wonderful, extraordinary activities that human beings cannot imitate.

In the scriptures we find that Kṛṣṇa lifted Govardhana Hill. At present, Govardhana Hill is seven kilometres long, but in the time of Kṛṣṇa it was five kilometres in height. In the evening when the sun would set in the west, the shadow of Govardhana Hill would fall upon Mathurā – that is almost forty kilometres away. Therefore Govardhana is called Girirāja, the king of the mountains. Today people consider Nanga Pārvata as the biggest mountain in India or Everest as the biggest mountain in the Himalayas, but originally Govardhana was bigger than both of these mountains. However, if you visit Govardhana today it is nearly seven kilometres long but hardly forty meters high at its highest point. Govardhana is slowly disappearing from our sight. Still, there are stones on Govardhana as big as houses. Where is the ‘bhagavān’ who can lift even one of these stones from Govardhana? Kṛṣṇa lifted the entire Govardhana Hill, but these ‘bhagavāns’ cannot imitate this.

If you want to buy a silk sari, you have to be careful. You can go from shop to shop and find nylon, Dacron, jute, but not silk. If you want pure silk you have to go to a reputable place that is approved by the government, or a family shop that has been in business for over a hundred years. Otherwise you will be cheated. Similarly, why would there be nothing to guide you when you are looking for God? Think about it. There will be a paramparā, an authorised agent, and authorised books. There will be standards.

Most people are too simple! Somebody may have some terrible disease and they are told, “Take your medicine, but at the same time pray to our Swami.” They continue to take their medicine, pray to the Swami and ultimately they live. Then they announce, “I prayed to the Swami and I lived!” Then this news spreads and the Swami becomes famous. But there is another fellow who prayed to Swami, but he died! He doesn’t come back and tell you – he can’t, because he’s dead! That is what is known in English as a ‘loaded deck.’ There are also atheists who don’t pray to God at all – but they take their medicine and also recover. There are people that never pray to God but make millions and become extremely rich. Don’t think that the proof of God is that you will get money, or that your health will improve when you pray to Him. The transient nature of sickness and wealth are simply features of this world.

We Want to see Our God Enjoy

Whether in illness or health, a devotee will always pray to Kṛṣṇa, “My success or failure is up to You.” If he doesn’t get rich, or he doesn’t recover from an illness, he doesn’t blame Kṛṣṇa. Somebody might say, “Just see, you prayed to Kṛṣṇa and nothing happened – you didn’t get any money, your health did not improve – there is no Kṛṣṇa!” But the devotee will simply laugh and say, “No, you don’t understand. Kṛṣṇa had more important things to do.” The devotee says that, “I have my karma and I don’t expect Kṛṣṇa to solve all my problems. He is not my servant, I am His servant.” There is a difference. Many people in the world have a hard time understanding suffering, and when they pray to God they expect that suffering, pain, disease and poverty will disappear. When that doesn’t happen they finally say, “There is no God!”

Recently I had a discussion with one Christian gentleman who proposed that Jesus was greater than Caitanya Mahāprabhu. He said, “Caitanya Mahāprabhu was absorbed in His own love for Kṛṣṇa, and in that love for Kṛṣṇa He left this world. But Jesus was much more merciful and selfless – he accepted crucifixion for everyone’s benefit.”

I told him, “Yes, this is the difference between Vaiṣṇavism and Christianity. We want to see our God enjoy – and you want to see your God murdered.” Later I wondered, “Why do they think like that?” I realised that suffering is a difficult thing to explain. If you don’t understand the concept of karma, you won’t understand suffering and finally you will want God to suffer also.

There are five main subjects that Kṛṣṇa explains in Bhagavad-gītā, and one of these subjects is karma – what is action and what is reaction. Without this knowledge you cannot understand why there is suffering in this world and you will subscribe to the idea that God is very cruel. “He makes me suffer, so He should suffer Himself.” This type of thinking has evolved in some religions. God must come and suffer. He must die. An ultimately what happens is that, rather than becoming religions of peace and love, they become religions of violence and intolerance. Under these types of religions, many people are put to death. These are not real religions. They are not based on real knowledge. They are based on false or misinterpreted knowledge. Real religion is based on knowledge and there is no superior book of knowledge than Bhagavad-gītā. This was Kṛṣṇa’s gift for the whole of humanity, for all time.

The Mother of Civilisation

Bhagavad-gītā is famous throughout the world and the knowledge found in Bhagavad-gītā, to this date, is unsurpassed. It has such a depth of knowledge that even if a scholar of Bhagavad-gītā reads it again tomorrow, he will find new wisdom in it. That is because Kṛṣṇa is infinite and the words spoken by Him are also infinite. Any other body of knowledge has some limitation.

Everyone is fascinated by the knowledge of computers now, but can a computer tell us how many particles of sand there are in Mumbai? Can a computer tell us how to make a grain of rice? No! A computer is only as intelligent as the person that programs it. One day, the wonders of the computer and the wonders of the cell phone will be of no more importance than the wonders of a Tata truck. What is a Tata truck? Nowadays such trucks are commonplace, but when the Tata truck was first introduced on the road, people lined up for kilometres to see it. Now we think, “I need the latest type of cell phone, I need the biggest and fastest computer.” This is called māyā-sukhāya. Today, if I purchase the best radio available, would everyone be happy to sit around and listen to it for hours? Of course not! Nobody cares for the radio anymore. But when the radio was first introduced, whole villages would sit in front of it and listen. Nowadays a radio is nothing. We became tired of the radio and it was replaced by something else that caught our attention.

But Bhagavad-gītā has held the attention of the intelligent people of this world for over five thousand years. Some people claim that the Bible is older than the Gītā, but historically speaking that is not true. Millions of people were reading Bhagavad-gītā before the Bible was even invented – and it was invented! It has not come from God.

dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavatpraṇītam

“Real religious principles are established by the Supreme.” (Bhāg. 6.3.19)

Some say that the Bible came to India a thousand years ago and that the Bible inspired the Indians to write the Vedas, Upaniṣads, Rāmāyaṇa, Mahābhārata and the Purāṇas. Then where did Ayurveda come from? That is also a part of the Vedas. Did that come from the Bible also, wherein it says that one shouldn’t take medicine? How did a book that says that you shouldn’t take medicine suddenly become the source of the Vedic texts on medicine? The Ayurveda has extensive knowledge regarding the science of medicine and surgery. Thousands of years before the people of Europe had even learned what medicine was, surgery was going on in India, metallurgical science was there, theories of atomic energy etc. The idea that the Vedic literature was inspired by the Bible was simply propaganda, created to establish Europe as being the original centre of civilisation. In order to do that, Asia was put down.

During the nineteenth century, there was much talk amongst European scholars about the origins of civilisation. Upon discovering India, some scholars became quite perplexed and their main task was to keep the origins of civilisation in Europe. This is called the ‘eurocentric worldview’. They said that the Aryans came from Europe to India and made India civilised. However, one difficult point to explain for them concerns the food found in both cultures, In Europe a thousand years ago there was basically only bread and something that you shot in the forest. That was it! And the only spice they had was salt. How did non-vegetarians with such a limited cuisine of bread, meat and salt come to India and create a whole thali? Not only a thali – a Gujarati thali, a North Indian thali, a Punjabi thali, a South Indian thali, and so many other varieties of food! Even today in Italy they have the most complete cooking culture in all of Europe. But still, there is not much variety. If you go to Germany, you may get five or six different preparations. If you go to Norway and other such places, there is mostly fish. There is not much variety.

And then there is also music. More or less, the only instrument that truly came from Europe was the guitar. How did the guitar come to India and transform into the sitar, the vīṇā, or the tampura? There is so much detailed knowledge of music in India. Therefore how can India not be the mother of civilisation?

For many years, so-called scholars said that the Vedas were simply mythology. Rāmāyaṇa, Mahābhārata and the Purāṇas were basically just tales for children. But let us ask one question – how many years does it take to fully study Sanskrit grammar? How long does it take to study and compose Sanskrit poetry? It takes twenty to twenty-five years for someone to become a kavi (poet). After becoming such great poets, why did the ancient ṛṣis decide to write fairy tales for children? That would be like attending a classical music academy for many years and after finishing your studies, going to Mumbai simply to compose jingles for Coca-cola commercials on TV! It is more likely that after learning the highest standard of music, you would go on to perform and present classical music. It is foolish to say that the Vedas, which are written in the most advanced language, are simply mythological stories and histories that never really happened.

Monkey Caste

In India, it is well known that the oldest God on this planet is Viṣṇu, Kṛṣṇa, or Rāma and everybody knows that civilisation began in India. The kṣatriyas left India after Paraśurāma destroyed their dynasties. They settled in the west during the Pre-Egyptian era and started civilisations all over the world. After these civilisations grew, people began to wonder where the first civilisation originally came from. At one time, people said that civilisation began in Baghdad, between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers. Here in India we have the Ganges and Yamuna – the Sumerians had the Tigris and the Euphrates. But in modern times, that idea has basically been rejected.

The knowledge is there that India is the mother of civilisation, but that knowledge is being kept hidden. If somebody wants to update the history textbooks, someone will object, “No, no, no – why do you want to update our textbooks?” Darwin’s theory has been disproven a hundred times all over the world, but still, when new textbooks are printed in India, they propagate Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. Then one may argue, “If Darwin’s theory is correct, why worry about caste at the time of marriage? We all come from monkeys anyway.” That is Darwinism. In India everyone is concerned with class and caste. That is natural. But in the textbooks that your children study, it says that we all evolved from apes. One day your son will tell you, “Father, why does it matter who I marry? It is written that we all come from monkeys anyway.” Monkey caste! Of course, I may be joking about it, but society considers caste and community to be very important. Yet the educational system says that we all come from monkeys. That is the so-called knowledge our schools and universities teach.

The Spectrum of Kṛṣṇa’s Līlā

Real knowledge can be found in every word of Bhagavad-gītā. In the purport to this verse, yadā yadā hi dharmasya, Śrīla Prabhupāda has placed emphasis on one particular word sṛjāmi. Śṛjāmi means that Kṛṣṇa was not created here – Kṛṣṇa came here as He is. Kṛṣṇa exists beyond the universe and the knowledge of this is in this one word – sṛjāmy. Śṛjāmi means that Kṛṣṇa is not born according to the laws of karma. We are born from a womb, but Kṛṣṇa is not born from a womb. The Bhāgavatam explains that when Devakī and Vasudeva were in Kaṁsa’s prison, all the demigods came to offer prayers and then Viṣṇu appeared. Everything was basically human-like up to that point, but then He made His grand appearance. First He appeared to Devakī and Vasudeva as Viṣṇu. He was fully decorated and holding a conch-shell, disc-weapon, club and lotus. Vasudeva and Devakī prayed to Viṣṇu, “Please become our son.” Then He manifested as baby Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa was not born in a maternity ward, or with the aid of a midwife, nor from the womb.

The story goes on to tell how Vasudeva and Devakī became fearful of Kaṁsa discovering Kṛṣṇa, how Vasudeva swaddled Him, how the gates mysteriously opened and how Vasudeva escaped undetected from the dungeon while the guards slept. That is the wonderful appearance of Kṛṣṇa.

We have all seen pictures of ourselves when we were small children. Can you imagine being able to live at any stage of your life at any time, all at once with no confusion? That is Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa can live as a baby, a child, a youth, a young man. He can live in all stages of life simultaneously. He is not born, enduring a period of growth from childhood to manhood and old age. He is eternally a child, eternally a youth and eternally an adult all at once. Is this impossible? Yes, it is impossible! It does not fit into the spectrum of the possibility of this world. He is beyond this world. The scriptures say that Kṛṣṇa walks and He does not walk, He talks and he doesn’t talk.

tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike
tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ

“The Lord is moving very swiftly and at the same time he is very still. He is very near to us and at the same time he is very far from us. He is within everything and he is outside of everything.” (Īśopaniṣad 5)

You and I were born and we grow old. We cannot show ourselves as we were two years back. That is impossible. We continue to age and there is no going back. Kṛṣṇa is not like that – He is living every stage of His life simultaneously. Our experiences in life are actually very small. But Kṛṣṇa lives a life beyond our experience. He is nava-yauvana, ever youthful. He is always a young boy. He is all of these things simultaneously and everybody that is eternally with Him is also like that.

When you calculate the time frame of the Mahābhārata, Kṛṣṇa was around 125 years old when He spoke Bhagavad-gītā. But according to those who saw Him, He looked as though He was only sixteen or seventeen years of age. If any of us reached 125 years of age, our skin would become wrinkled and our hair would fall out from our heads. We never hear that Rāma or Kṛṣṇa became old. We become old men and women, our teeth fall out, our hair falls out, we become deaf, but we don’t hear that Rāma or Kṛṣṇa ever became old. Old age is something that only happens in this material world to people who are born according to karma. Old age is under the law of karma, and Kṛṣṇa and Rāma are above karma.

In this world we can only be at one place at a time. The key word is ‘time’ – remove time, and then see what happens. But you cannot remove the time factor in this world. This is known in Sanskrit as the kāla-cakra, the wheel of time. It is fixed and it pervades everything and everywhere – up, down, inside and outside. Time influences everything, right down to the atoms and in between the atoms. If we could remove time we could be at two places at the same ‘time.’

Some people define eternity as, ‘a long ‘time’. But, no! Remove time and what remains is eternity. Eternity means no past, no present, and no future. The element of time is a dominant energy in this world and it is understood in terms of past, present and future. But in the world of Kṛṣṇa, there is no concept of time. Time is absent – there is no past, no present or future. That is called adhokṣaja, – beyond. We must always keep this in mind when thinking about the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa and Rāma.

The Challenging Nature of Kṛṣṇa’s Pastimes

When we think about the pastimes of Rāma, it is quite straightforward. Lord Rāma stands morally upright in society. He performs great sacrifices and goes to the forest when He is sent into exile. His life is very harsh, He has to fight to retrieve Sītā etc. Rāma’s pastimes are much simpler as compared to Kṛṣṇa’s. Rāma’s pastimes as a child are not given much emphasis. When we think of Rāma, we generally think about His activities as a man when He is sent to the forest, loses Sītā, fights with Rāvaṇa and becomes the king of Ayodhyā. His childhood pastimes are not an important part of His līlā.

When thinking about Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes however, it is somewhat challenging. Kṛṣṇa is so mischievous because He is displaying His pastimes as a boy. But when thinking about Kṛṣṇa we have to remember that He is not subject to the laws of material nature. He is not within the jurisdiction of karma. When the ordinary people think of Kṛṣṇa, they consider, “Oh, He steals butter and gives it to the monkeys, He steals the girls clothes etc.” If a small boy of six years old goes and steals the ladies’ clothes, what is that? It is mischief. We would consider such a child naughty and innocent. That is Kṛṣṇa. But some people think of Kṛṣṇa as if He were some lusty old man stealing the clothes of the ladies – if you think like that then you are mixing in nastiness and wickedness. Kṛṣṇa is a mere boy. He sees the clothes, laughs and steals them. He steals the butter and gives it to the monkeys. Such activities are charming. Ultimately, Kṛṣṇa does not steal anything, because everything already belongs to Him. He doesn’t steal anybody’s wife, because all wives already belong to him. One must be philosophically minded when thinking of Kṛṣṇa.

Kṛṣṇa is made of sat (eternity), He is made of cit (knowledge), and the most important element found in Kṛṣṇa is called ānanda (bliss). Factually speaking, we don’t know what eternity is, we don’t know what knowledge is and we don’t know what bliss is. We think these are abstract things of which we may have some experience. What is knowledge? Is knowledge something that we study in school for passing exams and getting on with life? Is knowledge something we simply find in a book? No. What is bliss? Does bliss simply mean happiness or laughter? Is Kṛṣṇa simply made of laughter? Kṛṣṇa is saccidānanda-vigraha – He is the pure form of all those things. Kṛṣṇa is not an ātmā inside a body. Kṛṣṇa is His body. You, on the other hand, are an ātmā within a body. Daily, so many bodily changes appear, but inside you are same. Externally your voice changes and even your mind changes – but you, the ātmā, remains the same. The ātmā never changes. The ātmā is also sat-cid-ananda, and the ātmā has a form also. We are of the same quality as Kṛṣṇa.

This world is a foreign land. We don’t come from this place. We cannot permanently stay in this place, and we are destined to move on. It is just a question of where and when we going to move. You can move laterally across this world, you can even travel down to Pātālaloka, the lowest planetary system in this universe. You can go up to the celestial regions of Svargaloka for some time, but like a politician’s term in office you will go up and then you will eventually come down. You cannot stay there. But when you reach Vaikuṇṭha, the spiritual realm, there is no coming down. Vaikuṇṭha is a complete world, with complete universes and complete planetary systems. Everything there is sat-cid-ananda. There is no janma, mṛtyu, jarā, vyādhi, (birth, death, old age, and disease). It doesn’t exist. There is no time there, no lust, no hate, and no greed. If you removed lust and greed from this world, all the major cities would disappear. They are all driven by lust and greed. This is the material world. If you removed lust and greed there would be no wars. Greed is the most horrible thing there is. That mentality of “I want, I want” is what causes us to suffer. It is what causes the world to suffer.

Kṛṣṇa’s birth may seem like a common birth in the sense that He looks like a baby, but higher knowledge informs us that He existed before He entered this universe. Before He came onto the stage, He existed. The stage I refer to is His līlā. We have seen actors that can play any role – an actor ages in a movie and gradually becomes an old man, one actor may play different roles in the same movie. There are even actors that can play male and female roles in the same film. Sometimes we don’t even recognise them if they are really good, and can’t accept that it’s the same person because the makeup artist has done such a good job. Kṛṣṇa also has a makeup artist. That makeup artist is called Yogamāyā. She makes up all the things for presenting the līlā of Kṛṣṇa, just as in a drama. There are certain examples in this world that help us to understand the higher world to some extent, but ultimately it depends upon realisation. Realisation means we have to transcend the limitations of this world and understand what is real. The process for self-realisation and realisation of Kṛṣṇa in this age is the chanting of His Names:

hare kṛṣṇa hare kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa hare hare
hare rāma hare rāma rāma rāma hare hare

This is the mantra, the meditation, and the process to awaken our eternal consciousness of Kṛṣṇa.

Makara - Myth or fact? - Swami B.G. Narasingha MaharajaMakara - Myth or fact?
Sri RadhastamiŚrī Rādhāṣṭamī
Śrīla Bhakti Gaurava Narasiṅgha Mahārāja (Jagat Guru Swami) appeared on Annadā Ekādaśī at Corpus Christi, USA in 1946. After studies in haṭha-yoga, he took initiation from his guru, Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda in 1970 and preached in the African continent for 3 years before accepting sannyāsa in 1976. After Prabhupāda’s disappearance, Śrīla Narasiṅgha Mahārāja took śīkṣā (spiritual instruction) from Śrīla B.R. Śrīdhara Deva Gosvāmī and Śrīla B.P Purī Gosvāmī. Although he spent most of his spiritual life preaching in India, Narasiṅgha Mahārāja also travelled to Europe, Mexico and the United States to spread the message of his spiritual masters. He penned over 200 essays and 13 books delineating Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava siddhānta. He left this world in his āśrama in South India in 2020.
  • Questions & Answers – Who is Qualified to Succeed the Ācārya?

Who is Qualified to Succeed the Ācārya?

By |January 27, 2023|Tags: , |

This important article from 1939, published in the Gauḍīya magazine after the disappearance of Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, consists of a series of questions and answers between a householder disciple of Sarasvatī Ṭhākura and Śrīla Śrīdhara Mahārāja concerning guru-godbrother relations, succession, and guru-tattva. In the original Bengali, some sections of the article were given emphasis with bold text and we have maintained the same formatting in the English version. This article was translated into English by Swami B.V. Giri and Sanātana Dāsa. (Note: The title ‘Prabhupāda’ in this article refers to Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura)

  • Lost Ancient Technology - Krishna Talk

Lost Ancient Technology

By |January 20, 2023|Tags: , |

In 'Lost Ancient Technology' Kalki Dasa argues that the technology of ancient civilisations such as Vedic India may have been more advanced than is currently believed, and that this idea has been dismissed by establishment science due to biases and a belief in linear evolution under the sway of Eurocentricism.

  • Questions & Answers – Who is Qualified to Succeed the Ācārya?

Who is Qualified to Succeed the Ācārya?

By |January 27, 2023|Tags: , |

This important article from 1939, published in the Gauḍīya magazine after the disappearance of Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, consists of a series of questions and answers between a householder disciple of Sarasvatī Ṭhākura and Śrīla Śrīdhara Mahārāja concerning guru-godbrother relations, succession, and guru-tattva. In the original Bengali, some sections of the article were given emphasis with bold text and we have maintained the same formatting in the English version. This article was translated into English by Swami B.V. Giri and Sanātana Dāsa. (Note: The title ‘Prabhupāda’ in this article refers to Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura)

  • Lost Ancient Technology - Krishna Talk

Lost Ancient Technology

By |January 20, 2023|Tags: , |

In 'Lost Ancient Technology' Kalki Dasa argues that the technology of ancient civilisations such as Vedic India may have been more advanced than is currently believed, and that this idea has been dismissed by establishment science due to biases and a belief in linear evolution under the sway of Eurocentricism.