Who-is-Qualified-to-SingGānera adhikārī ke? (Who is Qualified to Sing?)
Vairagya-NatakaVairāgya Nāṭaka - A Comedy Drama by Śrīla Prabhupāda
By Published On: April 8, 2022Tags: 5.3 min read

In this previously unpublished essay written by Swami B.G. Narasiṅgha Mahārāja on August 11th 2010, Mahārāja answers the question ‘ How many misconceptions does it take to make one a sahajiyā?” and presents a short quiz at the end of his article.

Question: How many misconceptions does it take to make one a sahajiyā?

Narasiṅgha Mahārāja: That depends on where you draw the line. Misconceptions may result in one being a sahajiyā, or misconceptions may result in one being apasampradāyika, or one’s institution becoming an apasampradāya (devoid of proper siddhānta). Misconceptions may also just result in one making little to no spiritual advancement, but not necessarily becoming a sahajiyā or apasampradāyika.

Generally speaking, someone with sahajiyā influences is not necessarily a sahajiyā. You really have to go over the edge before you rate being a full-on sahajiyā. In the estimation of some devotees, you’re not really a sahajiyā until you are a guy who wears a sāri, who puts a nose-ring and dances around thinking he has become a sakhī of Rādhā. No doubt, that is the extreme, but we might draw the line before things get that bizarre! There are many sahajiyā tendencies and misconceptions that can be weeded out long before getting to the stage of being a sakhībekhi. In contemporary times, we find that some individuals, and even whole sections within in our sampradāya, have adopted some sahajiyā influences (misconceptions), but they may not be full-blown sahajiyās. But yes, in some cases they are!

There are instances where we might think that controversy over philosophy is irreconcilable, or that both parties may be right. This, however, is hardly ever the case. One side of the argument is usually right, and the other side is wrong — but both parties usually stick to their guns, and there seems to be no ultimate conclusion, when actually there is.

A good example of this would be the so-called ‘jīva issue’. Did the jīva fall to this material world from the līlā of Kṛṣṇa or from Vaikuṇṭha? Śāstra and all previous ācāryas say, “NO!” but the issue is still unresolved among certain practitioners of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism. Śāstra and all previous ācāryas confirm that the jīva comes to this material world from the taṭasthā (marginal plane), and not from Vaikuṇṭha or the līlā of Kṛṣṇa. You or your friends may think differently — that the jīva does fall from the spiritual world and if so, then you are under a misconception…but you are not necessarily a sahajiyā. In fact, even the sahajiyās got the origin of the jīva right. So you are not a sahajiyā for thinking that the jīva falls from līlā, but you are leaning in the direction of becoming apasampradāyika.

An example of a misconception that has a certain prominence among sahajiyā circles (but has no śāstrika reference, nor any reference from the previous ācāryas) is the recent argument over the identity of Śukadeva Gosvāmī being (or not being) the pet parrot of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī. Śāstra and previous ācāryas make no mention of Śukadeva being Rādhā’s pet parrot, yet this story is cheered on by certain Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavas. If you happen to be one of them then, yes — you are adopting sahajiyā misconceptions, but you may, or may not, be a sahajiyā. It all depends on where the line is drawn. If Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura was drawing the line then you’re probably a sahajiyā, apasampradāyika, or both!

I tend to be more lenient and simply point out that such misconceptions stem from the sahajiyā community, that they are contaminated, and that proper adjustment would be prudent for bona-fide members of the sampradāya. However, even with such a lenient stance, I still get death threats!

If you want to know where you stand and you want to find out if you are influenced by misconceptions, then take the quick quiz below and see how you size up. Are your conceptions bona-fide? Are they influenced by sahajiyā ideology, apasampradāyika, or are they a bit of a New Age mix? The answers are YES or NO, and in some cases multiple choice. YOU decide where to draw the line…

1) Was Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu a sannyāsī before entering the gṛhastha āśrama?  YES or NO

2) Is the guru omniscient?  YES or NO

3) Did the jīva fall from the līlā of Kṛṣṇa? YES or NO

4) Was Śukadeva Gosvāmī the pet parrot of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī? YES or NO

5) Is Prahlāda Mahārāja important for attaining the ultimate goal of life? YES or NO

6) Is approaching higher Vaiṣṇavas the only qualification for hearing higher līlās? YES or NO

7) Can one become a dīkṣā disciple of Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada via the Ṛtvik system of initiation? YES or NO

8) Who gave Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda the title “Bhaktivedānta”? A: Keśava Mahārāja, B: Śrīdhara Mahārāja, C: Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura

9) What did Mahāprabhu authorize as the highest platform of premabhakti? A: Vipralambha  B: Sambhoga

10) Was inaugerating the saṅkīrtana movement the primary function of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu? YES or NO

11) Must the guru appear in a particular institution? YES or NO

12) Is gopībhāva quintessential to the order of sannyāsa. YES or NO

13) Did Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura reject Vipina Vihārī Gosvāmī as a sahajiyā? YES or NO

14) Is Advaita Ācārya’s position critical to one’s progress in Kṛṣṇa consciousness? YES or NO

15) Is Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda the sampradāyaācārya for the next 10,000 years? YES or NO

16) Did Srila A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda give his disciples the rāgamārga mantra and the mādhurya-rasa mantra? YES or NO

17) Is the devotion of Gadādhara Paṇḍita categorically superior to that of Śrī Nityanānda Prabhu? YES or NO

18) Did Srila A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda teach his disciples rāgānugabhakti? YES or NO

19) Was the devotion of Sanātana Gosvāmī superior to that of Mādhavendra Purī? YES or NO

20) Do previous ācāryas promote society consciousness? YES or NO

21) Does one have to be in a particular mission/society to be a true disciple of his guru? YES or NO

Who-is-Qualified-to-SingGānera adhikārī ke? (Who is Qualified to Sing?)
Vairagya-NatakaVairāgya Nāṭaka - A Comedy Drama by Śrīla Prabhupāda
Śrīla Bhakti Gaurava Narasiṅgha Mahārāja (Jagat Guru Swami) appeared on Annadā Ekādaśī at Corpus Christi, USA in 1946. After studies in haṭha-yoga, he took initiation from his guru, Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda in 1970 and preached in the African continent for 3 years before accepting sannyāsa in 1976. After Prabhupāda’s disappearance, Śrīla Narasiṅgha Mahārāja took śīkṣā (spiritual instruction) from Śrīla B.R. Śrīdhara Deva Gosvāmī and Śrīla B.P Purī Gosvāmī. Although he spent most of his spiritual life preaching in India, Narasiṅgha Mahārāja also travelled to Europe, Mexico and the United States to spread the message of his spiritual masters. He penned over 200 essays and 13 books delineating Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava siddhānta. He left this world in his āśrama in South India in 2020.
  • Sri Kusumanjali - Srila Bhakti Raksaka Sridhara Deva Goswami Maharaja

Śrī Kusumañjalī (An Offering of Flowers)

By |September 16, 2022|Tags: |

The following Bengali poem, in glorification of Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura Prabhupāda, was composed by Śrīla Śrīdhara Deva Gosvāmī Mahārāja prior to his acceptance of sannyāsa, and first published in the Dainika Nadīya Prakaśa on Sunday, 11th June, 1927. This poem was translated into English by Sanātana Dāsa and edited by Swami B.V. Giri.

  • Srila Prabhupada a Second Generation Devotees Perspective

Śrīla Prabhupāda – A Second Generation Devotee’s Perspective

By |September 9, 2022|Tags: |

In 'Śrīla Prabhupāda – A Second Generation Devotee's Perspective', Gaura Gopāla Dāsa Brahmacārī shares his realisations about Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda as a second generation devotee in the Kṛṣṇa Consciousness movement. He discusses how, due to institutionalization, the perception of His Divine Grace can become two-dimensional, especially when there is no substantial connection through a living representative of Śrīla Prabhupāda.