Articles by Guest Author
Topics about Vaiṣṇava Sārvabhauma Śrīla Jagannātha
This article, ‘Topics about Vaiṣṇava Sārvabhauma Śrīla Jagannātha’ was written by Śrī Yadunandana Dāsa Adhikārī, a disciple of Śrīla Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, and was published in ‘The Gauḍīya’ (Vol.6, Issue 40) in 1928. The author relates his experience with Vihārī Dāsa, the disciple of Śrīla Jagannātha Dāsa Bābājī, who narrates some of the pastimes of Śrīla Bābājī Mahārāja.
Śrīdhara Mahārāja Will Save Our Bhakti! (Colonial Cataracts and Societal Selectivity)
After our recent post on Youtube of Sarasvatī Ṭhākura’s revelatory words concerning Śrīla Śridhara Mahārāja as reported by Śrīla A.C. Bhaktivedānta Swami Prabhupāda, Mohanānanda Dāsa discusses why the Bengali and Hindi talks of Śrīla Prabhupāda are given little to no importance in Iskcon, suggesting that the reason may be due to a subconscious colonial mindset amongst many of the leaders.
Śrī Nimbāditya and Nimbārka Are Not the Same Person
In a previous article by Śrīla Narasiṅgha Mahārāja on Nimbārkācārya, there was mention of an article written by Śrīla Bhakti Prajñāna Keśava Mahārāja on the same topic. Some devotees have requested us to publish this article, which was originally written in Hindi and published in Bhāgavat Patrikā, Vol. 2, Issue 2, in July, 1956.
‘The Avatāra’ Biṣakiṣen
This article was first published in 1897 in Sajjana Toṣaṇī Vol.8, Issues 6, 7, 8 and 11 and was written by Śrī Nitya Sakha Mukhopadhyāya, an associate of Bhaktivinoda Thakura who lived in Balasore, Orissa. In his autobiographical letter, ‘Svalikhita Jīvanī, ’Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura wrote about this famous event wherein he brought a bogus avatāra to justice in 1871. However this account by Nitya Sakha Mukhopadhyāya is undoubtedly the most detailed version of the incident. It is not known whether the author was personally present or if Bhaktivinoda himself had narrated it to him in detail. Throughout the article, the author refers to Bhaktivinoda as ‘Deputy Babu’ denoting his government position as the Deputy Magistrate of Jagannātha Purī. It is possible that, out of humility, the Ṭhākura had requested the author not to mention his name.

